Posted by sparky on August 26, 1999 at 14:57:46:
In Reply to: Re: questions about this battle posted by Vex on August 26, 1999 at 06:33:15:
> Vex Nahh...I have to disagree here also. While by definition it is an "unholy" attack, it is a commune, which draws its powers from the gods, which (whether good or evil) makes it a holy attack. So it's unholy, but that means it's holy. Make sense? Nah, not to me either. Look at it this way, though. An invoker casts earthquake and this is neither holy, nor 'unholy'. It is just plain and simply, 'not holy'. Now a druid goes and does the same thing, summoning the powers of nature to cause an uprising of stone and earth to destroy his opponent...this is a holy attack in nature (ah pun, what?) because it's a commune. damn, I confused myself. Well fine no more alcohol for me tonight.
> No, they're unholy to an evil god, which is just the way an evil god likes it...