Re: On the contrary:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Stealer of Souls on October 15, 1999 at 11:05:05:

In Reply to: Re: On the contrary posted by Arolin on October 14, 1999 at 18:19:25:

> Lets say ragers are underpowered against masters
> The imms want to boost them up, make them balanced.
> They can do this by making them better against all the masters.

And making ragers have some way to work against the mindless scourge-spamming-is-the-be-all-end-all-master-tactic is just what they did. They balanced them against Masters not mages in general.

> Rather than making them the same against necros, trannys, conjurers and
> very good against invokers. They should make them a little bit better than all 4.

> Now the problem with that is that Invokers require alot more work.
> Invokers sould even be a tiny bit more powerful than
> the other mages for that reason

> dont give me shit about tatics about mages, because chances are, i know them better
> than you. I am considering the average standard invoker and the average standard rager

It's good to see your still the egomaniac asshole you've always been Arolin *applaud*

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]