assumptions vs evidence

assumptions vs evidence:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by An Immortal(IMM) on December 10, 1999 at 13:51:43:

In Reply to: Last series of posts, suggestions. posted by widowson on December 10, 1999 at 12:40:34:

The purpose of this response is to provide a serious, respectful answer to your post.

> I would hate to see what was such an enjoyable Mud die for the following reasons, as it seems to be doing.

I fail to see that CF is "dying". The player base has remained fairly constant in numbers, waxing and waning with college/holiday schedules and with this and that site ban or ban-lift. Players come and go; what makes you think the game is dying?

Follow Ups:

Re: assumptions vs evidence Laios 15:32:26 12/10/99 (1)
- Cabal involvement is the only critisizm I can agree to. Cassman 23:41:39 12/10/99 (0)
A different twist. Someone 15:21:26 12/10/99 (1)
- The playerbase Ponderer(VIP) 15:41:46 12/10/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> The purpose of this response is to provide a serious, respectful answer to your post. > > I would hate to see what was such an enjoyable Mud die for the following reasons, as it seems to be doing. > I fail to see that CF is "dying". The player base has remained fairly constant in numbers, waxing and waning with college/holiday schedules and with this and that site ban or ban-lift. Players come and go; what makes you think the game is dying?