Posted by The Angel Gabriel on August 03, 1999 at 14:45:39:
In Reply to: Actually, it was more like me, Graatch, and the entirety of the smug contingent, including non-Masters. posted by Challen on August 03, 1999 at 00:19:03:
In fact, none of what challen and arolin listed here are the real reason for the non-agression reinstatement, instead they are the necessary predicates to it. However, in short order it was reduced to a "you are lying," "no, you are lying" back and forth and, not surprisingly given the participation of Arolin, Graatch, Zhar and Malathrox, four people who are no strangers to arguing, the argument escalated and showed an insufferable disunity and sheer ugliness that, in the end, caused Twist to act as he did. Lets face it, had all the events occurred without comment, Twist would likely not have known about them. The same with all the past events that had already created the mountain of straw on the camel, the camel whose back was finally broken by *this* latest incident of internicine warfare on the cabal channel. I, myself, don't say who was right or wrong, or who said what, etc. That doesn't really matter anymore, this is all ancient history. I did, however, want to point out that the various attacks or specific pk's were not really what caused the reinstatement of the non-agression policy. Instead it was the attitudes and interpersonal relationships among the Masters themselves that caused it. Oh, I also don't want to imply that I think the various chars acted wrongly with respect to their chars. Arolin and Graatch, specifically, were obstreperous and "not-back-down" types of characters (like their human players, I suspect, but who knows?) and so it made a bit of sense for their chars to bicker. However, I will say that they took it just that bit too far and we are where we are now as a result. Thus Spake Zarathustra
The real reason is what occurred after these events, which was the vociferous argument over the cabal channel among Arolin, Graatch, Zharradam and Malathrox. Well, and a few others chimed in as well.
For those Masters that were logged on at the time, you know that the argument was horrific and frequently laced with colorful invective.
It is only because Masters were in effect fighting other masters that the policy was changed. This set of events that is the focus of this thread happened to be the last, and perhaps most egregious, but it was not the event in itself, really. It was the reactions to it and the stink to high heaven created by the players who argued over it.