Don't get me wrong.. many a times do non-defiler ragers end up defending the others against sylvans and vice versa. don't go thinking all is well in the happy go lucky alliance of Battle and Sylvan. n/t

Don't get me wrong.. many a times do non-defiler ragers end up defending the others against sylvans and vice versa. don't go thinking all is well in the happy go lucky alliance of Battle and Sylvan. n/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Newsboy on April 1, 2000 at 07:32:46:

In Reply to: I am glad you finally admitted that, of course I have something to say. posted by Someone on April 1, 2000 at 06:56:08:

>
>
> To me, a cabal is a group of people with extreme beliefs and views. They feel their way of thinking is the right way to live life. You cannot be part of a cabal if you only believe in some of your beliefs. For example, Empire believes in bringing order to the realm. They fight everyone that is opposed to such a view, i.e., barons, warders, ragers, dawn, and scarabs. We do allow arbiters to enforce the laws and we do allow masters to hold their item as long as they do not interfer with our goals, which masters have no reason to since they are strong supporters of discipline.
>
> Ragers hate magic. A group that allows the fungus of mages to grow within its halls makes the whole group foul. Does it not all need to be cleansed? Should battle not force this group to change their views and quit allowing the fungus to live, to grow? How is battle going to fight and WIN against these mages if they are allowed to prosper in this cabal? Why is battle afraid to enforce its beliefs on others? It is not enough to say, we can kill your mages and you can kill our defilers. Battle must force warders not to except mages, that is what battle stands for, that is the only way they can achieve their goals. Anything less is just plain bending your beliefs so you do not have to fight more than one cabal, which is something the bravest of brave should not fear.
>
> The same can be said with warders allow battle to except defilers. Warders should enforce their beliefs on others also. I mean, I have seen plenty of logs were warders have targeted group members of defilers and added them to their running list of people to kill. Why not target the entire cabal until they submit to your beliefs? Again, the only reason is because they care more for cabal wars than true beliefs.
>
>
> Come on people, live up to the challenge. Why be afraid?
>
>
> Then there is entropy, they go against everything we think they should do, thus creating chaos.

Follow Ups:

I guess it is all a matter of how you look at it. Xzortok 08:32:56 4/1/2000 (4)
- Re: I guess it is all a matter of how you look at it. Entity 06:47:49 4/2/2000 (3)
  - The strongest of the strong accept that, that is Empire all the way....Go ragers!!NT Xzortok 12:06:28 4/2/2000 (0)
  - If ragers made this deal with warders, it should hold for all non-cabaled warriors that have mage friends..NT Someone 12:04:26 4/2/2000 (1)
    - Why? Do all those uncaballed warriors fight the tower? Entity 12:25:10 4/4/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > > > > To me, a cabal is a group of people with extreme beliefs and views. They feel their way of thinking is the right way to live life. You cannot be part of a cabal if you only believe in some of your beliefs. For example, Empire believes in bringing order to the realm. They fight everyone that is opposed to such a view, i.e., barons, warders, ragers, dawn, and scarabs. We do allow arbiters to enforce the laws and we do allow masters to hold their item as long as they do not interfer with our goals, which masters have no reason to since they are strong supporters of discipline. > > > > Ragers hate magic. A group that allows the fungus of mages to grow within its halls makes the whole group foul. Does it not all need to be cleansed? Should battle not force this group to change their views and quit allowing the fungus to live, to grow? How is battle going to fight and WIN against these mages if they are allowed to prosper in this cabal? Why is battle afraid to enforce its beliefs on others? It is not enough to say, we can kill your mages and you can kill our defilers. Battle must force warders not to except mages, that is what battle stands for, that is the only way they can achieve their goals. Anything less is just plain bending your beliefs so you do not have to fight more than one cabal, which is something the bravest of brave should not fear. > > > > The same can be said with warders allow battle to except defilers. Warders should enforce their beliefs on others also. I mean, I have seen plenty of logs were warders have targeted group members of defilers and added them to their running list of people to kill. Why not target the entire cabal until they submit to your beliefs? Again, the only reason is because they care more for cabal wars than true beliefs. > > > > > > Come on people, live up to the challenge. Why be afraid? > > > > > > Then there is entropy, they go against everything we think they should do, thus creating chaos.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]