Posted by Xzortok on April 1, 2000 at 22:21:46:
In Reply to: Xzortok is right. posted by Khiravn on April 1, 2000 at 20:56:49:
Imperial Immortal said "loyalty" will make you Anathema
You really think if I said over the cabal channel I was not loyal to Empire, I would be in Empire for very long?
As far as character assassinate Elgadon, he does that himself everytime he posts on the forum. He has a lot of Sierothe in him.
As far as why I decided to post it, I pretty much tried to get an answer in character, as you can read it did not get me anywhere. I asked more than just two people. I asked several ragers and have been for a long time. At least here, I got some of you losers to read and express a view. Whether it is my view or not, at least it was something.
As far as cabal philosophy hypocrisy just toward battleragers. It is almost every cabal right now that does it, including the Empire and masters. I just think ragers are in the best position to set the example, they are in power right now. I think if they did change, it would not effect them as much as everyone tends to think, esp when you consider Empire has been doing it for about two years now. The have their moments of glory and weakness.
As far as it really changing. It will only change if the immortals enforce it. No player is willing to lead the way. No cabal should be allies with another, when this happens they sacrifice their beliefs. I am really surpised no one has even bothered to try and change it, Cf over 6 years old. The only people that came close was Empire with you could only group with ciztiens or bloodoath rule. If all cabals did that, it would be a lot interesting cabal system than the one sided system we have now, which is all Empire/Master or all Warder/rager/others.