Re: 1 Vs 4, hell all these fellars 1 on 1 are panzies.:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Clown Bake on April 25, 2000 at 09:17:54:

In Reply to: 1 Vs 4, hell all these fellars 1 on 1 are panzies. posted by Giddion on April 25, 2000 at 01:30:30:

> I really dont understand how people think they are so tough fighting against people with these odds. Sure the rp doesnt have to fall into line here, but surely if you want to have more fun you could do something alone the lines of, fight 1 on 1. So you have your bum buddy shaman summon them for you. You could still fight them 1 on 1.


All things aside...do you think that you are tough beating down a thirty something mage (non-caballed)? Do you think you are tough beating down some warrior (caballed or not)? With your powers I certainly would not. However, I would think that you were tough if you beat off two or three of these so called weaklings. They really have nothing to prove...you on the other hand...

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]