You didn't gangbang, no, but it wasn't some fight against overwhelming odds n/t

You didn't gangbang, no, but it wasn't some fight against overwhelming odds n/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Flontinot on May 9, 2000 at 12:17:33:

In Reply to: Re: To alleviate confusion: posted by Aradan on May 9, 2000 at 10:47:18:

> > Apparently (looking at the Imperial gangbang on Chaldaie's log) he doesn't mean 4 vs 10 *at once* He means 4 vs. 1 or 2 or maybe 3 over a period of two hours. So a series of Imperial gangbangs. Unfortunately, it seems as though the only people with logs of these battles would be the 4 Imperials who were involved with all of them, not the individual people they gangbanged.
>
> No, at once the most it got was like 5 other vs 3 us. There were a lot of participants, they just didn't organize well. Sevrac wasn't there for most of it.
> It was like a 3 hour running battle, I just wanted to see some other perspectives.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > Apparently (looking at the Imperial gangbang on Chaldaie's log) he doesn't mean 4 vs 10 at once He means 4 vs. 1 or 2 or maybe 3 over a period of two hours. So a series of Imperial gangbangs. Unfortunately, it seems as though the only people with logs of these battles would be the 4 Imperials who were involved with all of them, not the individual people they gangbanged. > > > > No, at once the most it got was like 5 other vs 3 us. There were a lot of participants, they just didn't organize well. Sevrac wasn't there for most of it. > > It was like a 3 hour running battle, I just wanted to see some other perspectives.