Posted by Darlow on May 20, 2000 at 17:16:55:

In Reply to: to Anti-rager and all who share his sentiment posted by Thinhallen on May 20, 2000 at 15:05:35:

> Your leader takes the name of Graatch and he also feels as you do, but instead of bitching and moaning ALL the time, he tries to prove his point and fails miserably. So follow your leader, roll up a rager, and see how effective you can be if you're even able to get into ragers. Most likely you'll go the way of your leader and explain how overpowered you are while losing con at a rapid pace. BTW I believe Traelok is an anti-paladin, I could be wrong, but if he is, he has one easy way to combat "bloodthirsting fools".
>
> -thinnie

Follow Ups:

• Re: I believe that is the one he is talking about... After all Trell's con was in such a miserable state at lvl 30, that he deleted instead of even trying to hero. (nt) Rune(VIP) 17:37:52 5/20/2000 (6)
  • Trell was pretty much unstoppable one-on-one, or two-on-one, even. He lost all that con charging giant groups. (n/t) Darlow 20:07:36 5/20/2000 (5)
    • Sure, Trell lost con, but uh, he's right under crewso on the pk list yup 20:24:46 5/20/2000 (4)
      • And uh "crewso" was uncaballed Graham 04:29:32 5/21/2000 (2)
        • Wasn't he Anathema? Giving him even more penalties? n/t TSM 10:36:37 5/21/2000 (1)
          • Or more targets..(n/t) Confused and Abused 16:23:27 5/21/2000 (0)
      • Gee, I'm impressed. I wanna be just like Trell!!! Not!! n/t Pendragon_Surtr 02:02:00 5/21/2000 (0)
• Re: I believe that is the one he is talking about... After all Trell' Rune(VIP) 17:36:59 5/20/2000 (0)

Post a Followup