Posted by Duh on May 26, 2000 at 00:06:05:
In Reply to: Re: Well... Oops on previous. posted by Harlequin on May 26, 2000 at 00:00:18:
> I won't get into the hows and whys on the truce, seeing as how that's info only a few know, BUT... if you look at it from all angles, you might just see it isn't bad rp. As an Imperial, i never really felt the Blades should be forced into combat with the Ragers... Especially seeing as how almost every Blade gets treated like dirt in Empire by the other sects. Things became so bad at one point that several of us began refusing requests for rescues at Cabal guardians, even going so far as to shove a few of the more belligerent Arcanes in front of us.
>
> Look, all of the Cabals tend to have truces depending on who is leading. They most often do not last past the Leader's death. I even remember a time that the Village left the Tower be to focus all attention on the Imperials. The Immortals encourage the intercabal conflicts and truces as it leads to interesting situations.
>
> My present rager agrees with Minalcar's reasoning. He doesn't like it, it chafes, but he sees the logic. And, if it frees us up to fight more of a "one-front" war, it just plain makes sense. I know many of you don't like this new arrangement, but just look at it from all sides and I think you might see the bigger picture.
>
> Harlequin