Let's go to the video tape:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Imbrogno on June 1, 2000 at 09:29:00:

In Reply to: bullshit posted by Leradok on June 1, 2000 at 08:58:11:

> From our interaction, I see you acting like a fire AP, not a storm shaman.
> but probably storms have better stats so you decided to go storm one.

That's your opinion, but you don't know the first thing about me.

>
> Considering this fight:
> Prehistory: wanted Coaric, not in your range
> and "innonect" me, in your range.

There is no such thing as an innocent rager for Imbrogno. Your leader takes the book, most of the other high-level ragers take the book, therefore you're guilty by association. If I can kill you, and kill you some more, and a little bit more, and maybe a few times with guards for that nice exp hole when you're wanted, you'll delete and that's one less I have to worry about defending against my retrieval. You can thank Minalcar every time you die.

> What you expect from Arbiter elder?
> right, go and hunt criminal, but...
>
> 1) You were sitting in summoning points in Old Thalos
> is it the way to harm wanted person out of range? no
> it is the way to catch some rager in range, yes

I've died to 5 or 6 pk-deaths. Four of those were at the massive giant, 3 of those were during retrieval attempts, the other was when I was after a criminal. Why do I die at the massive? Because I can't word, and I can't retreat in a chosen direction like you can. Not being able to word through prayer while in the village is up for debate, I'm not going to get into it. So, if I can kill you outside the village(Old Thalos) before I go after the criminal that's bonus.

>
> 2) You were taunting me to come and fight you
> but you refused the duel to death without fleeing at the same time.

Duel to the death is a rager's fight. No fleeing means you thirst and I can't use my two most powerful supplications because I have to use them to start combat. I'm not a moron, giving up the right to use rot/wither would make me one though.

>
> 3) Well, you intrudered in the village so we fought
> You can claim that you did it to catch a criminal
> but...

That's right, after the criminal, but I had to go through you first. You wouldn't stand aside like I asked. I gave you two options. Come out of the village and die honorably, or stand aside while I went after the criminal. You chose the ungiven third option, die dishonorably at your massive giant.

>
> 4) When I fell you just looted me and gone
> you did not show again at the village to finish
> your primary job, hunting a criminal.

And I was poorly equipped from dying to Malaglen the night prior so your stuff was put to good use. My guards on the other hand were dead, so I had to leave to rest up and call new ones.

>
> 5) and the most funiest move to see you quit
> 3 min after Ionais shows up (and he decided to take the book)

Question my bravery all you want. Arbiters(including the imms) know that I don't shy away from battles. I've fought Minalcar more times than I can count(I could post a log of 4 hours(real-time) of fighting him, I've fought Arlian. Both of those stand a better chance of killing me than Ioanis. There was a crash, which interrupted a discussion I was having with two soon-to-be applicants, I logged on after the crash to tie up those loose ends and once that was done I quit for real-life reasons. But, I don't need to defend my player integrity against you.

>
> I don't hate arbiters (though many ragers do)
> Yes, sometimes as a criminal I have to fight them
> but it is not my war against aribter cabal
> they are doing their job and I'm doing mine.
> I know good people among them, whom I respect
> but you is not one of them.

Again that's your opinion. You can just assume that I hate you for what you are, because of Minalcar. I, as a player, hate ragers, Minalcar just gives me an IC reason to hunt you like the dogs that you are. The "innocent" are always the most hurt by foolish leadership decisions. Count yourself amongst them.

>
> Now, I don't care about your hidden role
> but your actions were:
>
> I want to kill someone, hmm, storm shaman is toughest
> he's good.. doesn't matter...
> hmm, a rager, cool... 8 ranks below me.. cool!

If you want to rank-sit at 40th that's fine. But you surrender your right to bitch about higher characters laying your ass to rest. You should be thankful that there aren't more spectres.

As an aside, I don't need to have a reason to kill you. Arbiters don't take a vow of pacifism upon entrance. We're free to hunt just like any other.


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]