Posted by Graham on June 5, 2000 at 12:15:49:
In Reply to: No spoonfeeding here. . . but maybe some help nonetheless. Some of it can be generalized to other "cheap" tactics. posted by Nepenthe(IMM) on June 4, 2000 at 17:52:17:
> Think outside the box, grasshopper. . . >sure, there might be better things you >could have chosen to do during the fight, >but that's not your real problem.
Ah yes unkle, -who's- box is the problem?
My box is vastly different to yours and i promise you that about 30 of the logical solutions that i could offer to deal with this situation are not allowable in the game..do not offer zen buddhist guidelines when we are dealing with an imms (extremely limited) view of what should and should not work...(ie anyone seen a disbelieve command recently, doing nothing as in pretending it does not exist does nothing either)
>here are several ways to try to do that, >although the best one that comes to my mind >is extremely evil in nature.
>
> There is no spoon. . .
oh and would this be the same thing that you suggested about 2 years ago..
"i can think of a really easy way to not be bothered by wall of thorns..other than not being in the same room"
and in the 2 years since i don't think i've come across anyone who has done such a thing...
either expand your box or stop acting like we need to get an FBI character profiler to work out how your brain works just so we can get the syntax to the semantics..
Graham,
nepentheness is one thing,
downright obstinance is another..