One very important fact is left out of this log, and it makes ALLLLL of the difference. This answers Woru's and Hhmm's posts. nt

One very important fact is left out of this log, and it makes ALLLLL of the difference. This answers Woru's and Hhmm's posts. nt:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Imbrogno on June 12, 2000 at 18:16:36:

In Reply to: If he's a rager raiding for his item from battle, isn't it illegal to flag him, just like it is to flag a retrieving entropist? n/t posted by Hhmm on June 12, 2000 at 18:14:29:

> .

Follow Ups:

What is *the* fact? If you would be so kind as to post it, thank you. (nt) twiddle 18:27:25 6/12/2000 (11)
- No law was broken, not even the one Woru and the other guy mentioned. Ponder that for awhile, and you might figure out the fact. nt Imbrogno 18:29:29 6/12/2000 (10)
  - Ahem... twiddle 18:49:04 6/12/2000 (8)
    - There's some lame loophole about 'loitering'. Basically the laws are written so that they can flag anyone and cover their asses. n/t Chalupah 19:32:10 6/12/2000 (0)
    - I meant no arbiter broke a law. nt Imbrogno 19:19:48 6/12/2000 (2)
      - Ofcol isnt a protected area?? thats where kalkor or whatever attacked me Glamsher 19:27:55 6/12/2000 (1)
        
        You were wanted at the time. nt Imbrogno 19:29:04 6/12/2000 (0)
    - Re: Ahem... Jafel 19:08:24 6/12/2000 (3)
      - Sorry, I haven't been playing lately... twiddle 19:21:06 6/12/2000 (2)
        
        Heh Jafel 19:38:52 6/12/2000 (1)
        
        It's nice little things like that that balance the damn ragers. nt Imbrogno 19:45:08 6/12/2000 (0)
  - Okay, i was there...you attacked me because Ragers and Arbiters are at war...makes since, and im pretty sure you did what you were sposed to do, i didnt post this to cause an all out groanfest ..heehee i just thought it was funny Glamsher 18:41:33 6/12/2000 (0)

Post a Followup