Ok, without this getting into an historical debate, read....

Ok, without this getting into an historical debate, read....:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Clemmy on July 29, 2000 at 02:32:41:

In Reply to: Well... America's "control" of goods into Japan was construed as a hostile action. N/T posted by theidiot on July 28, 2000 at 17:46:02:

Strategic supplies were only denied to Japan when they found it convienent to start mass murdering whole chinese and korean villages. So do not for one minute hint the United States was wrong in thier actions to keep war materials from flowing into a nation of genocidic mass murderers (yes, I know reduntant statement).

How you can even make an remark the US was wrong about thier trade with Japan is irresponsible, and reprehensible. Open a book about WWII once in awhile, or talk to a Vet, you might learn something. (yes, there are still WWII vets out there)

Follow Ups:

Re: Ok, without this getting into an historical debate, read.... the idiot 16:10:28 7/30/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Strategic supplies were only denied to Japan when they found it convienent to start mass murdering whole chinese and korean villages. So do not for one minute hint the United States was wrong in thier actions to keep war materials from flowing into a nation of genocidic mass murderers (yes, I know reduntant statement). > > How you can even make an remark the US was wrong about thier trade with Japan is irresponsible, and reprehensible. Open a book about WWII once in awhile, or talk to a Vet, you might learn something. (yes, there are still WWII vets out there)