Posted by Zepachu on August 1, 2000 at 18:38:09:
In Reply to: "I mean, honestly, what Necromancer that has crimson scourge doesn't use it when they effectively sleep someone?!" -- You said he didn't use it. Not that he shouldn't have attacked. Don't try changing what you said. n/t posted by Pokachu on August 1, 2000 at 18:31:32:
...you have nothing intelligent to say, just trying to twist my words and implications because you don't want to admit what you said was wrong.
You said, and I quote.. "Um...see all those times he yells? Those are failed maladicts. Mhorem tried, but failed them. Lowbie necs can't maladict all day long. Try not criticizing when you're clueless. n/t "
You told me to not criticize when I am clueless.. As I told you, I'm not clueless. What you said was like.. "Oh well, he had 5 maledicts at his disposal, but only did 2.." I mean honestly, if you look at the log he tried to poison three times it seems to me,.. failed it twice, it didn't take hold once. Why give up? He gave up.. he's a Necromancer, not an Anti-Paladin. An Anti-Paladin can get away with sleep, some maledicts (not all available to him/her) and then attacking.. a necromancer simply cannot.
So do me a favor and chill out man.. I might have said he didn't use it, but I never said he SHOULD have attacked did I? On the same token I didn't say he SHOULDN'T have attacked.
Expand your mind and stop being so petty.
> > > > .