Posted by Someone who knows on August 2, 2000 at 12:28:18:

In Reply to: Aerhak was a weak blade anyway. Probably why he deleted so quickly. Clothing is nothing, strategy and knowledge is everything. (to a degree) Good fighting on your part Frey. (n/t) posted by Zepachu on August 2, 2000 at 11:52:57:

Hm, Zepachu if you used both strategy and knowledge that might apply. You never showed either.

Follow Ups:

• At least I don't cloak my name, Someone. Proof = Valid argument. Drawing from a few scenarios you might have seen me in, means nothing. I did everything the way I wanted to as Zepachu. (n/t) Zepachu 12:41:32 8/2/2000 (21)
  • Woo-hoo, preaching about name handles, my club strengthens!!! n/t Vimal 15:18:10 8/2/2000 (5)
    • Here, here! (n/t) Proud Blade, posts 100% as Proud Blade or a character.(VIP) 18:19:38 8/2/2000 (4)
      • Mmm... pet peeve... The Arcane(VIP) 13:57:48 8/3/2000 (2)
        • Interesting. When I learned it in high school it was different.... Graatch(VIP) 20:18:10 8/3/2000 (0)
        • You mean... Proud Blade was just smacked down? *gasps and slides slowly down the southern wall, landing on the floor with a thud.* (n/t) Zepachu 16:49:41 8/3/2000 (0)
      • Mmm... pet peeve... The Arcane(VIP) 13:55:05 8/3/2000 (0)
  • Another thing. Minalcar 13:50:25 8/2/2000 (12)
    • And I give you some insight now, too... Zepachu 14:00:58 8/2/2000 (10)
      • haha... haha... Quinthen 17:12:47 8/2/2000 (1)
        • Good advice, but I don't think it was in reference to my replies to flames only.. I reply to just about anything I can offer insight with.. This is one of my first flames. *cheer* (n/t) *grin* Zepachu 17:43:09 8/2/2000 (0)
      • Re: And I give you some insight now, too... Minalcar 14:07:01 8/2/2000 (7)
        • You're absolutely right (little text).. Zepachu 14:14:28 8/2/2000 (6)
          • Fuck sake, was this the IMPERIAL blade sect or fucking play group for sword specs? Graham 15:22:35 8/2/2000 (1)
            • aaaahahahahahahahahaha.. the imperial blade sect... hahaha. yer funny (no sarcasm intended) (n/t) Zepachu 15:28:14 8/2/2000 (0)
          • But your wrong. *smrik* Aerhak 14:38:32 8/2/2000 (3)
            • This conversation is over, Aerhak. Many times I said "from my experience" or "from what I saw" I never said it was fact. You saying I stated it to be fact is in effect your opinion of my opinion that you think is fact. *boggle* (n/t) Zepachu 14:57:45 8/2/2000 (2)
              • From my experience you shagged sheep and rogered young boys..oh wait, this is slanderous and you should be allowed to respond... Graham 06:16:01 8/3/2000 (1)
                • Sure he can, and I'll surely respond.. but this whole thread has been about bickering back and forth, myself included, and I was trying to end it. :P (n/t) Zepachu 08:37:46 8/3/2000 (0)
    • Tis true indeed Minalcar, but that was not my goal with Zepachu. I do not mean to come off as 'king shit' by answering every post.. I just give insight if I am sure of an answer, is all. (n/t) Zepachu 13:53:48 8/2/2000 (0)
  • Here let me help. Minalcar/Lladrimier 13:47:37 8/2/2000 (1)
    • Sorry, pal. Sendrik got his 'ass killed' countless times too. He sure as hell possessed more strategy and tactics than anyone else I've seen in a while (n/t) Zharradam 00:04:30 8/3/2000 (0)

Post a Followup