Re: He explained it

Re: He explained it:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by MT Paladin on August 6, 2000 at 13:16:52:

In Reply to: He explained it posted by Me on August 6, 2000 at 11:36:01:

Well...you show immense wisdom in your response...however, how he obtained it is irrelevant. We are only offered tidbits of a larger picture and portions of the story are portioned out. When you defend ore argue one certain point in a discussion, you fail to address the entire picture and lose sight of the topic.

It is my suggestion you look at the responses offered by others and determine if you have validity to your point, or are you just addressing a single frame of an entire panoramic movie.

Best of luck.

P.S. The "idiot" response was uncalled for.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Well...you show immense wisdom in your response...however, how he obtained it is irrelevant. We are only offered tidbits of a larger picture and portions of the story are portioned out. When you defend ore argue one certain point in a discussion, you fail to address the entire picture and lose sight of the topic. > > It is my suggestion you look at the responses offered by others and determine if you have validity to your point, or are you just addressing a single frame of an entire panoramic movie. > > Best of luck. > > P.S. The "idiot" response was uncalled for.