Well I consider conjurer pets to a whole other person.

Well I consider conjurer pets to a whole other person.:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Warrior on August 8, 2000 at 11:24:50:

In Reply to: I enjoyed how Trifiv felt it necessary to ambush, and thus make it three on one when it was already two on one n/t and I dont really count pets posted by laughing on August 8, 2000 at 00:40:03:

Have you ever fought with a archon or elemental one on one? They are incredably strong and dish out a lot of damage too. If you really think a lone warrior to take out a conjurer with servants like that, you have got to be kidding.

Follow Ups:

Sort of. The Arcane(VIP) 13:25:55 8/8/2000 (3)
- However, it is QUITE possible for a single, lone, unaided Rager warrior to beat a conjurer with two good pets. I've done it. I've seen other people do it. Please post a few. 16:06:32 8/8/2000 (1)
  - sorry I've seen it as well, and once did it, rager vs conj and two pets, but I didnt log any occurence as I dont log n/t old rager 18:15:01 8/8/2000 (0)
- *fume* n/t Baroman 14:17:55 8/8/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Have you ever fought with a archon or elemental one on one? They are incredably strong and dish out a lot of damage too. If you really think a lone warrior to take out a conjurer with servants like that, you have got to be kidding.