Posted by Forum Reader on August 8, 2000 at 12:45:43:
In Reply to: Read this: posted by Dash on August 8, 2000 at 12:19:40:
> How many wild animals have druid supps at their disposal? If a lion could make his skin take less damge and uproot a treant from the ground to help him kill, he would do it before attacking.
That would suppose a logical thought process. What's wild about that?
Does a lion sharpen it's claws, and teeth before it decides to strike? No.
Instinct will tell the lion to attack or to flee when directly confronted
with it's attacker.
> Being wild -does not- mean being mindless and stupid.
Does it mean following a logical course of action before striking?
> Being wild -does not- mean acting like a lion when you are really a human.
You equated her attack with that of a wild animal remember?
> If you are a human, you act like a wild human. I have played Warders and trust me, her attack was completely justifiable.
I've also played Warders. There was nothing primal or "wild" about her attack.
She camo'd herself against a ranger that could already see her, put up her protective
supps, and called for a treant. Is this an act of a wild creature or a human prepping
to attack. IMHO, it's not.