Posted by Imbrogno(VIP) on August 24, 2000 at 11:17:54:
In Reply to: In response.... posted by Flontinot on August 24, 2000 at 10:21:43:
What I posted wasn't even a flame, you're just being paranoid and overly sensitive about the cabal you've inherited leadership of.
I know sylvans gang, you know sylvans gang, nobody is flaming sylvans for ganging. What I meant by my statement was(and I apologize if it wasn't said clearly enough for you) is that attacking what appeared to be a fairly prepared storm giant paladin with an arcane muter isn't necessarily a sure fire way to be successful in the game. If I wanted him dead, I'd have ganked him(were I sylvan), because warders are allowed and you use what you've got. Why an elf muter wants a storm paladin(who is no longer an arbiter) dead is a question to be found out in the game, that's why I didn't bring it up.
For Umguy:
Arbiters are allowed to gang. Sylvan are allowed to gang. Everybody is allowed to gang, except battleragers. They do, you and I know it, but they're not really supposed to unless it's in one of those far too generally applied circumstances that calls for it. My only beef with battleragers is that they all say "We don't gang" when they do. If they didn't, I wouldn't have a problem.
People need to settle down and not take what is a horrendous waste of time and energy so seriously. I've chilled, I suggest you all do the same.