Posted by Saagkri on September 7, 2000 at 18:31:23:
In Reply to: Funny how barons are willing to argue with arbiters about a flag. NT posted by Kennan on September 7, 2000 at 01:45:35:
Entropy has every right to point out the hypocracy and inconsistancies of an arbiter. He can use Arbiter law against an arbiter if he can because he knows the arbiter is bound by them. It doesn't mean the baron has to embrace them himself.
By the same token, one does not have to be brave to point out the cowardice in one who claims to be brave but falls short does one?
Atheists battle christians all the time by pointing out any inconsistancies in the bible, and reminding them that they never live up to their ideals. They say things like, "if you're such a christian, you wouldn't do this or that." But of course as the atheist tries to use the bible against the christian, the atheist doesn't believe anything the bible says. This is the same strategy when Masters critisize a cowardly rager from the standpoint of the village rules, or the Baron using the Pillar against the arbiter.
Ramble over.
Saagkri