Explain that...

Explain that...:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Past blooded knight on September 15, 2000 at 17:34:40:

In Reply to: I must admit: honorable combat is about the stupidist thing they have come up with. posted by Someone on September 15, 2000 at 16:20:09:

Its nothing new to see this. Blooded knights of old used to get it. And for Cothurak to call it Dis-honorable combat is rather a crock because 1 on 1..hrm, well you get the idea.

I see nothing wrong with the skill, its not somethign everyone gets but for her to have the ability to pull a imperial away from a group of other imperials, including the Emperor is a good skill. To see Imperials have to keep themselfs on their toes rather then depend on their numerous group mates..is always a good thing.

Follow Ups:

The problem with this so-called honorable combat. Someone 18:15:51 9/15/2000 (0)
A good thing? There are no Imperials at hero, besides like four, who are never on at the same time besides me.... Cothurak 18:08:40 9/15/2000 (1)
- RE: laf, might not exist now, but in 3 weeks there are going to be at least 50 odd imperials there is a fucking massive swarm of lowbies (assumeing they dont all get kicked) hastur 05:42:39 9/16/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Its nothing new to see this. Blooded knights of old used to get it. And for Cothurak to call it Dis-honorable combat is rather a crock because 1 on 1..hrm, well you get the idea. > > I see nothing wrong with the skill, its not somethign everyone gets but for her to have the ability to pull a imperial away from a group of other imperials, including the Emperor is a good skill. To see Imperials have to keep themselfs on their toes rather then depend on their numerous group mates..is always a good thing.