I don't need to defend myself, but see explanation inside (text):

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Rager1 who participated in raid on September 18, 2000 at 04:53:53:

In Reply to: laugh posted by semi-master on September 16, 2000 at 01:58:51:

I can easily explain my point of view. First, I came to the Tower in search of both of you. After a brief skirmish, you ran. I wanted both of you dead. Sylvan1 also wanted both of you dead, so we contunued to raid. He attacked the golem, I concentrated on harming you. Then Sylvan2 comes. I felt uncomfortable in his company, and I said so to both Sylvan1 and Sylvan2. Since I couldn't do anything about presence of Sylvan2, and wanted to see both of you dead, I stayed here and attacked golem and archmage. When Rager2 appeared, I felt we can take the Orb and invited him there. Note: I didn't attack golem or archmage along with Sylvan2, nor Rager2 did. Finally, when Sylvan2 died to archmage (you haven't mentined that, why?), I looted him and wasn't going to return his things. Where do you see the cooperation? We didn't rely on Sylvan mage, we could kill the archmage ourselves, and were going to, if Sylvan2 wouldn't interfere. And about your comment... I didn't care what you will think of me. You could have gotten me pretty easily when I was alone. You chose to run. When the odds were fair, you simply recalled. When the odds went bad, you decided not to show your face. My conscience is clear, though I was irritated at the presence of mage. I have nothing to worry about. By the way, if I was you, I'd try to avoid being offensive. Recalling without trying to defend isn't a good move. Don't take it too personally, it's just a game. Have a nice day.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]