Didn't Scaurus prove that a long time ago? n/t

Didn't Scaurus prove that a long time ago? n/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Newsboy on January 12:40:43, at 0PST:0:0:

In Reply to: Re: Pitiful that you immorted and you were never dedicated to ragers from the start. Much less writing enough pestering scrolls to symbolize rp'ing enough to get immorted. Guess all one needs to do is write some stupid notes to get raised*boggle* posted by Nesam on January 9, 2000 at 21:008:29:

> Yeah, it sure is a pity that he actually developed a roll. As leader I heard more people come to me saying, "My parents were killed by magi, let me in." Once kastellyn was tainted with magic...I am sure his path to becoming a rager was extremely difficult. He rp'd a wonderful bard and he rp'd an excellent rager. So, why don't you take your post and shove it up your ass.

> With much respect,
> Nesam

Follow Ups:

Actually, Scaurus proved that new and interesting roleplay, never going ooc, and playing a class for the *class* (not a warrior with songs or a mage with enhanced damage), is rewarded by the Imms. n/t Scaurus(VIP) 11:40:27 1/13/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > Yeah, it sure is a pity that he actually developed a roll. As leader I heard more people come to me saying, "My parents were killed by magi, let me in." Once kastellyn was tainted with magic...I am sure his path to becoming a rager was extremely difficult. He rp'd a wonderful bard and he rp'd an excellent rager. So, why don't you take your post and shove it up your ass. > > With much respect, > > Nesam