Posted by Shokai(IMM) on February 1, 2000 at 15:40:58:
In Reply to: Jagaub (text) posted by Mithadris on February 1, 2000 at 11:55:56:
> if a Maran wants to break laws, they should not be Paladins! If I had a Necromancer follow Shokai and be turned to goodness, would I still be a necromancer? No! It's innate class restrictions that nothing can go against. Markianise should choose between Shaman or Warrior, because he is not a Paladin. Paladins are Lawful Good. Law=Order..."laws" are set up to order society, why do you think Entropy (chaos) have problems with laws? Whether a Maran choses to obey laws is more or less thier descions...though (as stated above, I kinda already had my input on Marans and law) I agree paladins should try to uphold order, and should (this is how I would play a Maran paladin...actually I could say did play...please please please don't do follow this just because I said it here, I try to allow a good deal of flexibility in Marans to avoid cookie-cutters) not go out of thier way to kill an evil in town, since it does add to the chaos. However, I can see how other Maran would look down on a fellow Maran that didn't take every jump to spill an evil's blood on the ground that was possible. *shrug* Now, as for a necromancer following Shokai and losing his powers...come now, bad example my friend, a necromancer's art draws from very dark and ugly magics...that are inherently corrupting and evil. A Paladin believes in order as a moral code...see the difference?