Posted by Cethern on January 8, 2000 at 17:24:21:

In Reply to: my farewell posted by svetozat on January 8, 2000 at 11:12:23:

If I had to guess, you were unempowered because you
were an elf healer turned master's bitch, who wouldn't
attack Viscrinth the lich, telling me that I was just
as evil as him (A neutral dwarf) because I'd killed
goodly mages. You then told me he was the most peaceful
of all liches and serves as a good example to the others.
He's 6th on the all-time pk list. Glad he's peaceful...
Basically, you weren't goodly. I'd bet you have friends
in masters or other master pc's and decided to carry all
your dislike for ragers in those forms over to this one.

I took particular offense as Cethern, because he was a
villager that never attacked anyone who had not done
serious things to harm the village. If you weren't a
mage or an imperial, and didn't raid the village, I
didn't attack you. I never killed a warrior because
a thief peeked him with a potion. My view was when the
mages are destroyed, the potions will disappear. Those
who are neutral but need a bit of magic to survive should
be dealt with when the real problem, (mages and the tower)
are destroyed. To fight them now merely makes the village
more unpopular, and the backlash would turn these warriors
more towards magic, and would impede the greater goal.

If you want to take the role that any rager is evil, because
we dicriminate against magicians for no good reason (In your
eyes) that's fine. But you then can't not attack evil mages
in addition to that. If the whole tower would hunt you for
fighting their evil memebers, then it is just as evil as the
village. You can hardly argue which side (master of village)
started the war between us, and assign all the blame for the
conflict to them.

Cethern

Follow Ups:

• Re: my farewell svetozar 21:33:41 1/8/2000 (2)
  • Being chaotic rather than a double agent? Graham 0PST:0:0 1/01:35:42/ (1)
    • Re: Being chaotic rather than a double agent? svetozar 0PST:0:0 1/08:34:22/ (0)

Post a Followup