Re: Masters

Re: Masters:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Promenas on January 20:53:07, at 0PST:0:0:

In Reply to: Re: Masters posted by Bemus-ed on January 19:25:17, at 0PST:0:0:

> You still fail to understand me. I talk about decent players. One decent player is worth fifteen morons, perhaps more. Sylvan always has had a decent player base. Masters right now, seems not to.

*chuckle* I haven't been watching Masters too closely recently, and didn't realize their lacking was that great. I've always thought they had a "decent" player base as well, but if they no longer do, that's a problem.

However, most times, they have more players, even only counting the decent ones, than Sylvan. The pendulum swings again?

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > You still fail to understand me. I talk about <b>decent</b> players. One decent player is worth fifteen morons, perhaps more. Sylvan always has had a decent player base. Masters right now, seems not to. > chuckle I haven't been watching Masters too closely recently, and didn't realize their lacking was that great. I've always thought they had a "decent" player base as well, but if they no longer do, that's a problem. > However, most times, they have more players, even only counting the decent ones, than Sylvan. The pendulum swings again?