Posted by Macheath on February 25, 2000 at 07:15:07:
In Reply to: Re: Hmmm. Are you blind? Text... posted by Arkteri on February 24, 2000 at 10:50:40:
> Claiming that "you had every item you wanted, when you were on" might
> be a valid statement, but not exatcly what I would be satisfied
> with, as Emperor .. I mean, if the Empire
> should REALLY WORK, as a cabal, then its
> pathetic to claim that just becus you had the
> other cabal items, then you are satisfied and
> the goal of the Empire had been achieved. I would
> expect nothing less from the Empire, than seeing
> Centurions on MS in Galadon, than seeing the Empire
> take over all protected areas, seeing them destroying or
> corrupting arbiters (completely).. I am rank
> 42 and I havent had any problems with imperials,
> except for once .. I'm not sure how all this
> would fit into the game, but resting with the
> statement "I had all the items i wanted when i was on",
> is really making the Empire looking ridicilous
> if you ask me.
> I believe that the scales of game balance should
> be able to be pushed far .. Look at the arbiter
> case, or the KNIGHTS, if one cabal becomes too
> weak it should be disbanded. On the other hand,
> if one cabal gets too much power and influence,
> then I believe it should not, by divine interferrence
> be set back, in the name of game balance. Thats what
> makes CF funny .. That *alot* of things is possible,
> and almost *everything* depends on the participants
> (players) .. That way, the game flow and evolution
> of the world becomes ever changing and really funny
> to play a part of.
> In other words, resting with the other cabal
> items conquered and the game then stops for you
> as Emperor is truely not very extrordinary and
> hardly deserves Immortality in my oppinion.
> I for one would have enjoyed an Emperor taking it
> alot further, giving me more reasons to fighting back
> even more.
>
>