This is my view of what I have seen passing through the guilds etc...:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Nobody on February 28, 2000 at 16:59:30:

In Reply to: Approximate Rarities of Classes posted by Vet on February 28, 2000 at 13:29:54:

WARRIOR: Very common
Who hasn't grouped with one.


TRANSMUTER:Common
Common to group with ... See them sitting in there guilds on par with the conjurer or though I think the conjurer think takes the cake these days.
(easily disputed)


INVOKER: Rare
I can't remember the last time I grouped with one.


PALADIN: Uncommon
Saw them going in and out of their guild all the time when I was playing one.


NECROMANCER: Rare
Hello are they ever home. Maybe Zozsaul or what ever is making them popular again (but I haven't seen to many of the effects yet.)


HEALER: Rare
Grouped with one recently I would say becoming a touch more common but still rare.


CONJURER: Common
In the magic game there as common as warriors.


DRUID: Very rare
Where have all the druids gone ... they are around though.


ASSASSIN: Common
I changed this because I have travelled with a lot more assassins then thieves. Seen them in there guilds etc...


THIEF: Common
Just a little more uncommon then assassins but not by far.


BARD: Uncommon
There around ... pansies


RANGER: Uncommon to Rare
Seen a few around.


SHAMAN: Uncommon to Rare
This is a shame really but I would have to liken them with healers.


ANTI-PALADIN: Common to Uncommon
There are heaps of them ... just looks towards the empire.


Look this is from my point of view at the times I'm on ... the characters I tend to play are evil so I would be only able to group with half the number of shamans out there (and this is an assumption) if you get what I mean.


There are many variables and the only way to find out is by an actual survey.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]