Posted by Arkteri on February 29, 2000 at 11:28:35:
In Reply to: Slight misunderstanding then posted by The Arcane(VIP) on February 29, 2000 at 10:49:09:
The one and only trigger I use (and the one
that started this whole trigger-thread) was
#Ok. {Kryn has arrived} now triggers {knife Kryn} @ {5}
#Ok. {Kryn the} now triggers {knife Kryn} @ {5}
Well. I do actually have blackjack variant also.
I do not rely on these to do the trick for me.
Actually its only really useful, for non sneaking
opponents. If you study the log that started
this whole mess, carefully, you will notice the command
"p" is issued to the tintin script.. That is actually
a *gasp* ALIAS, which is short for "knife $target".
*IF* I had relied on the trigger alone, I would not
have been succesful in any of the "knife" attacks, since
I would be relying on having to do a "look"
first to get the text string that would trigger
the knifing. This delay would have made the special
guards attack me first, since I was wanted and
I would have been unable to use "knife".
Funny isnt it, with all those harsh words about
I am cheating, why I play CF at all and that
I am completely clueless triggeruser person.
The truth is I am not a trigger user, if that is
a person who relies on triggers. Why? I would not
be winning any fights if I relied on triggers.
(like the problem described above concerning
the knife trigger and special guards).
I use 2 triggers occasionally and a couple of
aliases. So please dont refer to be as "trigger user".
If I had had been one, I would have
failed knife becus the special guards would
have attacked me, and I would prob have lost
the fight. Study the damned logs before starting
bashing and intimidating other people like that.
OK, you can all now being bashing me for the
"p" alias for "knife $target" .. I should
have been typing "knife krynn" instead of the short
alias "p", to avoid being "a clueless cheater
that ruins the mud experience for myself" .. eh?
> Ok, I saw a post by "trigger user" that had an obscenely-large subject, and figured the name and the obscenely large subject pointed to you as the poster. Well, I removed someone else's post, then. :P
>
>
The point about keeping insanely long (n/t) subjects down still applies.
>
>