Posted by DL on March 23, 2000 at 16:56:44:
In Reply to: Precedent. One sets a precedent. n/t posted by Graatch (VIP)(Wearing his professional hat) on March 23, 2000 at 11:51:43:
> > It just doesn't carry as much weight as a cabal hero complaining about it (and roleyplaying his heart out to change it within the game).
> >
> >
> > Ok, you have heard a cabal hero complain about it. Me. The fact that I do not have one currently does not change the fact that it made me absolutely sick when I did have one. I guess I could have tried to change it in game...but there were perhaps two other mortals who would have listened to me at the time, and I had been getting more and more sick of it during four rager chars just about in a row.
> >
> > Now, I do not mind being ganged. Hell, I know it is a viable tactic. Grallon does not hardly ever gang, but that is more from a lack of possible groupmates than a desire to fight one on 5-7. I would not even mind being ganged by battle, under certain conditions, me raiding their cabal, me attacking one of them during their raid of the tower...stuff like that.
> >
> > What gets me is that the whole Idea of Battle is the "brave warrior" thing. And I am to the point of sad resignation that very very very few ragers will refuse the gang/tag team because it would diminish their bravery.
> >
> > I never asked for it to be easy to kill ragers. I never complained about deathblow, although whupping on a rager and getting two unspeak deathblows and dieing nomatter what clothes/protections/preparations I make(more often than not)kindof stinks.
> >
> > Now dhaevor is another story, Ive never seen him do the tactics I am against, and I have seen him many times take out 5-6 people solo...its just that he is the single good example that I can see in the masses of tag-teamers.