Posted by Sylok on March 29, 2000 at 22:29:13:

.

Follow Ups:

• Care to explain this now? Spammy log inside. Ludi 09:32:21 3/31/2000 (0)
• Ahh, one of my favorite interviews was with you. Farewell n/t Quinthen 10:55:09 3/30/2000 (0)
• Re: Gone for good to the good old delete;delete n/t Radakh 06:05:19 3/30/2000 (0)
• I just can't believe you ripped your name off of a Comic Book, and they let you slide. Sheesh! read the rules pal. N/T Captain obvious 23:33:40 3/29/2000 (2)
  • Never read the comic book pal =P n/t Sylok 01:54:43 3/30/2000 (1)
    • Re: Yeah, right!!! j/k/n/t Svirfie AKA Cyclops 05:27:53 3/30/2000 (0)
• Re: Gone for good to the good old delete;delete n/t Ex-blade 22:55:39 3/29/2000 (2)
  • Re: Gone for good to the good old delete;delete n/t Sylok 23:08:45 3/29/2000 (1)
    • Maybe he is playing the odds, imperial + blade = crappy player. Now take the square root of a rager/ by the common factor of rager powers= crappy player with awsome powers that can gang-bang and thus kick a blades ass even if he was good.NT Someone 13:16:31 3/30/2000 (0)

Post a Followup