Re: Two forms of bad RP that are generally accepted, when they shouldn't be

Re: Two forms of bad RP that are generally accepted, when they shouldn't be:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by GodMoney on April 2, 2000 at 19:00:22:

In Reply to: Two forms of bad RP that are generally accepted, when they shouldn't be posted by Polemachus on April 2, 2000 at 16:08:37:

Your first point is good. But if you're going to be more realistic by adding the "ing" at the end of laugh or chuckle...why not just be completely realistic and type heh, or hahahahaha.

Your second point is retarded. If I met Hitler and I knew that due to divine intervention he could not touch me, or order anyone else to touch me I would spit on him, slap him around a little and call him an ass pirate. CF has a few variables that allow for different actions than real life does.

GM

Follow Ups:

Heh, not sure why....but(I think there may be text) Grallon 06:20:23 4/3/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Your first point is good. But if you're going to be more realistic by adding the "ing" at the end of laugh or chuckle...why not just be completely realistic and type heh, or hahahahaha. > > Your second point is retarded. If I met Hitler and I knew that due to divine intervention he could not touch me, or order anyone else to touch me I would spit on him, slap him around a little and call him an ass pirate. CF has a few variables that allow for different actions than real life does. > > GM