The _real_ first servant

The _real_ first servant:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Saerin on April 4, 2000 at 09:58:09:

In Reply to: Umm... not true posted by Jheriohn on April 3, 2000 at 16:46:07:

Let Bolt/Holtz sort it out, but I'm curious.

Were you in the same room as them both. Did
the bard actually say.. 'HAR! summon de foul
mage!

Just want to see if your statement is one of
fact as you directly witnessed them or are
you just assuming they were working together.

Follow Ups:

Pre-fall of Knights, so I doubt you were before me. the First Servant 10:59:20 4/4/2000 (4)
- Well using 'First Servant' I naturally assume Dawn not Knights... besides do you even know how long I've been around? Saerin 11:09:46 4/4/2000 (3)
  - An answer. the First Servant 11:42:20 4/4/2000 (2)
    - hehehe.. Servant of the Mother.. ( if you are who I think you are.) why didn't you say so. 8Ş Saerin 13:13:49 4/4/2000 (1)
      - Bingo! *chuckle* nt the First Servant 13:50:49 4/4/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > Let Bolt/Holtz sort it out, but I'm curious. > > Were you in the same room as them both. Did > the bard actually say.. 'HAR! summon de foul > mage! > > Just want to see if your statement is one of > fact as you directly witnessed them or are > you just assuming they were working together.