I'm tired of ragers as much as the next person but.. the Defender is not some idiot who can't fight on his own.. but teamed with another battle warrior both are 3x's as strong

I'm tired of ragers as much as the next person but.. the Defender is not some idiot who can't fight on his own.. but teamed with another battle warrior both are 3x's as strong:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Person on April 4, 2000 at 11:09:28:

In Reply to: Grim reality, or shallow RP? There is no room in rager RP for someone with a defender outlook. posted by An Old Arbiter on April 4, 2000 at 06:24:09:

> The basic requirements for RP in Battle goes something like this:
>
> 1.I hate magic.
> 2.Battleragers are best warriors.
> 3.I want to cleanse magic from Thera.
>
> If you have an RP angle that would be more in line with a defender, say you're motivated by fear of magic or you're a ranger that loves nature so much he doesn't want to see it swept away as the Masters want, you basically get laughed at.
>
> Essentially, everyone is interviewed like they are going to be a rager. The RP requirements havn't really caught-up with the new roles.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > The basic requirements for RP in Battle goes something like this: > > > > 1.I hate magic. > > 2.Battleragers are best warriors. > > 3.I want to cleanse magic from Thera. > > > > If you have an RP angle that would be more in line with a defender, say you're motivated by fear of magic or you're a ranger that loves nature so much he doesn't want to see it swept away as the Masters want, you basically get laughed at. > > > > Essentially, everyone is interviewed like they are going to be a rager. The RP requirements havn't really caught-up with the new roles.