As proof

As proof:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Someone on April 11, 2000 at 23:28:23:

In Reply to: Bloodthirst posted by Someone on April 11, 2000 at 23:20:03:

My last statement was there is no reason for a warrior to be anything else but a bersker rager. I sight as proof all the negative comments Dhaevor got when he did not allow berskers anymore. Berskers are a one man wrecking crew, there is hardly any reason for scouts or defenders. I think my way will make defenders a lot more useful because they can help counter the lack of parrying for bloodthirst. Thus keeping with the idea that CF is a team sport.

Follow Ups:

the problem with that is... (some text) warrior 09:03:10 4/12/2000 (0)
Berserkers vs scouts Uli 06:25:21 4/12/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > My last statement was there is no reason for a warrior to be anything else but a bersker rager. I sight as proof all the negative comments Dhaevor got when he did not allow berskers anymore. Berskers are a one man wrecking crew, there is hardly any reason for scouts or defenders. I think my way will make defenders a lot more useful because they can help counter the lack of parrying for bloodthirst. Thus keeping with the idea that CF is a team sport.