Why, thank you, my dear chap. But my goodness or lack of such is utterly irrelevant to the question of conjurers, to wit, their sucking or lack thereof. :) (n/t)

Why, thank you, my dear chap. But my goodness or lack of such is utterly irrelevant to the question of conjurers, to wit, their sucking or lack thereof. :) (n/t):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Darlow on April 19, 2000 at 13:16:47:

In Reply to: Indeed Darlow is rather good n/t posted by Dolph on April 18, 2000 at 19:15:19:

> > Just lay the crack pipe down. That's it. Right on the table.
> >
> > I'm in utter agreement with Polemachus. This is my first conjie. I just got my raven familiar. I can't imagine playing any other class again.
> >
> > And don't tell me I'll change my mind when I have to deal with conjuring and binding. Because I won't.
> >
> > The purpose of this post? To grovel before SphereMaker and give him, and everyone else involved in the class design, my congratulations and gratitude. Well worth the three-year wait. :)
> >
> > Darlow

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > Just lay the crack pipe down. That's it. Right on the table. > > > > > > I'm in utter agreement with Polemachus. This is my first conjie. I just got my raven familiar. I can't imagine playing any other class again. > > > > > > And don't tell me I'll change my mind when I have to deal with conjuring and binding. Because I won't. > > > > > > The purpose of this post? To grovel before SphereMaker and give him, and everyone else involved in the class design, my congratulations and gratitude. Well worth the three-year wait. :) > > > > > > Darlow