It's a matter of workload.

It's a matter of workload.:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Proud Blade(VIP) on April 23, 2000 at 01:08:25:

In Reply to: Re: You missed the point: posted by ellokraine on April 23, 2000 at 00:27:18:

> I stand thoroughly corrected. But if the Imms are indeed watching and being subjective then they can not simply assign a case by case penalty or not penalty?

My thought was that the IMM then has to do a lot of work. It might be better to have a "standard" penalty coded, so that the IMM just types the one command to change the character's alignment, and it's done. There would be some other command to change their alignment without penalty, in exceptional cases.

The option could (and should) still exist for more ambitious IMMs to take matters into their own hands, and assign a "custom" penalty.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > I stand thoroughly corrected. But if the Imms are indeed watching and being subjective then they can not simply assign a case by case penalty or not penalty? > > My thought was that the IMM then has to do a lot of work. It might be better to have a "standard" penalty coded, so that the IMM just types the one command to change the character's alignment, and it's done. There would be some other command to change their alignment without penalty, in exceptional cases. > > The option could (and should) still exist for more ambitious IMMs to take matters into their own hands, and assign a "custom" penalty.