I agree too, but...:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by sideswipe on April 24, 2000 at 14:48:37:

In Reply to: I believe Imm's should not anath mortals. Very long. posted by Graatch(VIP) on April 24, 2000 at 13:41:26:

Well said. But there's always been a grey area about how much the imms should intervene, and that's part of why role was put in. i.e., how can you be a spy when the imm cbs "funny, you were just defending the grove..." -- which is part of why role was put in, so the imms will know characters' intentions.

I'm just afraid that if I put something in my role about a screw up, it will draw an imm's attention to it, and the imm will screw me over. In any cabal where you have to follow rules to stay in, especially harsh ones like the empire, you should be able to toe the line as much as you can.

IC, we'll say the imms know all, but will not act with all knowledge because that will influence the play before them. I wouldn't think this would reduce imm/cabal interaction.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]