A question?

A question?:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Nobody on April 26, 2000 at 18:32:55:

Anti-Paladins on the whole are meant to be warrior with a few spells. I gather this from there high level spells imbueing their weapon. At the moment when looking at an anti-paladin I would play him as a mage in the mid levels much like a necromancer probably.

But... As stated above I believe the Anti-Paladin is meant to be played as a warrior with spells not the other way around. Do you think Dodge would possibly be a apart of their training say around 16th or 17th I believe it would fit. It would give them even more of a chance to go one on one in the higher levels where AC doesn't count(I believe Proud Blade here).

Now you may say why not a Paladin, why shouldn't they get Dodge? Their spells are their protection and they are meant to rely on them more. Clearly an anti-paladin is more of a warrior then paladin just because they can practice more weapons at the start. And dirt-kicking etc...

I think AP should have Dodge and I would like to know some opinions of why or why not?

I know you can easily play one without it I just thought it might add to their toe to toe combat and since they train so much like a warrior at the start why not?

Follow Ups:

And why stop there? Joshu 03:32:22 4/27/2000 (1)
- Why give them more powerful spells when they are warrior orientated - Dodge would help them out toe to toe (and where did I say they weren't a powerful class) Nobody 18:20:38 4/27/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Anti-Paladins on the whole are meant to be warrior with a few spells. I gather this from there high level spells imbueing their weapon. At the moment when looking at an anti-paladin I would play him as a mage in the mid levels much like a necromancer probably. > > But... As stated above I believe the Anti-Paladin is meant to be played as a warrior with spells not the other way around. Do you think Dodge would possibly be a apart of their training say around 16th or 17th I believe it would fit. It would give them even more of a chance to go one on one in the higher levels where AC doesn't count(I believe Proud Blade here). > > Now you may say why not a Paladin, why shouldn't they get Dodge? Their spells are their protection and they are meant to rely on them more. Clearly an anti-paladin is more of a warrior then paladin just because they can practice more weapons at the start. And dirt-kicking etc... > > I think AP should have Dodge and I would like to know some opinions of why or why not? > > I know you can easily play one without it I just thought it might add to their toe to toe combat and since they train so much like a warrior at the start why not?

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]