That should read "Good vs. Evil is NOT the end all and be all..." nt

That should read "Good vs. Evil is NOT the end all and be all..." nt:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Smirk on April 29, 2000 at 15:14:16:

In Reply to: feh posted by Smirk on April 29, 2000 at 15:13:10:

> Maybe CF should just disband all of the cabals because of how detrimental they are to roleplaying.
>
> That or maybe the cabals should be restricted to one align only, neutral for arbiters, sylvan, ragers, and entropy, evil for empire, masters, and scarabs, and good for dawn. Oh wait, that'd be stupid.
>
> Good vs. Evil is the end all and be all of CF, just like earth is completely democracy vs. communism. There are important gray areas and caviats for everything and that is what makes CF so roleplay friendly if you take the time to do it.
>
> I'm dumber for having read your post.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > Maybe CF should just disband all of the cabals because of how detrimental they are to roleplaying. > > > > That or maybe the cabals should be restricted to one align only, neutral for arbiters, sylvan, ragers, and entropy, evil for empire, masters, and scarabs, and good for dawn. Oh wait, that'd be stupid. > > > > Good vs. Evil is the end all and be all of CF, just like earth is completely democracy vs. communism. There are important gray areas and caviats for everything and that is what makes CF so roleplay friendly if you take the time to do it. > > > > I'm dumber for having read your post.