Posted by Nivek on May 2, 2000 at 13:46:33:
In Reply to: Well... posted by Proud Blade(VIP) on May 2, 2000 at 11:49:06:
I like to think that I am on good terms with higher-ups in most of the cabals. Though I have had both Ragers and Masters angry at me before, I try to diffuse the situation peacefully. There are two reasons for this: 1) Its the way my character is roleplayed 2) Nexuz is right: I can't take a rager or master 1 on 1 to force my point. Here is where Nexuz is being mislead and Proud Blade understands - If my character wanted to fight to enforce his views, He'd roleplay a Maran or Maran-like character. Not a Servant of the Dawn.
> 1) There is no strong conflict between Dawn ideology and Rager ideology. If Ragers attack your Dawnie non-mage, they don't do it because they're a Rager. They do it for other reasons, good ones or not.
>
> 2) How many Scarabs are there? Three?
>
> 3) Dawn is not about being able to kill. That's why the powers aren't so well suited for offense. Actually, Dawn's powers are well suited to the cabal's purpose.
>
> 4) The Dawn philosophy has an inherent advantage- they work well together, and help each other out. Rager beating you down? Call for aid. For a comparison, try this:
>
> [BATTLE] Nexuz: Um, Chaldaie is whooping my ass up and down Galadon. Can I get a ranger for herbs, a couple of defenders to heal me, and a lowbie to loot me if I die?
>
> Not all cabal advantages/disadvantages show up on the "Cabal Powers" list, Nexuz. Stop whining.
>
> > If dawn has so many enemies(Ragers, Scarabites and
> > Imperials)! They have to be prey for them, the powers of the dawn cabald is nothing compared to the powers of ragers (offensive). I cant see anything else than dawnies must be realy underpowered and it would be easy for a rager or a imperial to kill one from dawn.