I'll be more blunt in my patronizing then.

I'll be more blunt in my patronizing then.:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by The Arcane(VIP) on May 3, 2000 at 07:30:42:

In Reply to: If your point is that ragers aren't overpowered, no you didn't make it nor can you. posted by Pointer out of untrue points on May 3, 2000 at 07:18:31:

None of the mages I have ever played has ever viewed Battle as a threat, nor have I ever died to one or multiple Ragers while playing a mage, in a total of maybe 700 hours of playing time. Not once. This applies at all levels, and it applies to both before and after the Battle revamp.

Am I an arrogant bastard? Yes. But I'm playing the same character classes that you are. I'm just doing it better, obviously. If Ragers look overpowered to you, it's because you're doing something wrong. Don't sit and whine about them being overpowered, figure out what you did wrong and don't do it next time.

Follow Ups:

Uh, not to be a party pooper, but... Graatch(VIP) 07:40:48 5/3/2000 (3)
- Re: Uh, not to be a party pooper, but... The Arcane(VIP) 07:54:59 5/3/2000 (2)
  - NT/OK, but what do you think about Battle Bards?/NT A pissed arby 07:57:40 5/3/2000 (1)
    - I think Battle bards are weaker than Sylvan bards and Entropy bards, by *FAR* (text) The Arcane(VIP) 08:02:37 5/3/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> None of the mages I have ever played has ever viewed Battle as a threat, nor have I ever died to one or multiple Ragers while playing a mage, in a total of maybe 700 hours of playing time. Not once. This applies at all levels, and it applies to both before and after the Battle revamp. > > Am I an arrogant bastard? Yes. But I'm playing the same character classes that you are. I'm just doing it better, obviously. If Ragers look overpowered to you, it's because you're doing something wrong. Don't sit and whine about them being overpowered, figure out what you did wrong and don't do it next time.