god your stupid:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by alrucus on May 9, 2000 at 02:49:22:

In Reply to: Why not? you did it with ragers. posted by Someone on May 8, 2000 at 14:26:30:

> The old powers of ragers were more powerful than the crappy powers of blade and black.

yes... they are also supposed to be the best warriors and such of thera.. that is why they have the skills they do.. but a well skilled empirial, blade or black.. can kill a villager. fire a-p's have killed villagers solo. ask takashimi ;P

Granted divine has good powers and arcane is ok. Black powers would be ok, but power of the damned cannot be improved beyond 75% since the days of Istendil, which is kinda sad because you gave deny summon to conjurers that works 100% of the time.

it is easy to get it past 75%.. you just have to find out how.. and it is really easy. takes a while, but easy to do, do not say it cant without trying.

Blade powers are just horrible. Shove is ok, but has limited use.

shove is perhaps the best skill out there for any cabal.

Imperial training is ok, but for it to be the most powerful power of the blades, it is weak.

that is probably because your weak... wouldnt choose empirial defense for a fire warrior axe spec would you? ... wait were talking about you. is a nice thing to have, makes an arial sword spec with haste and imperial defense almost never get hit by anyone except spells.

Nightfist is just a joke. lets see... add 10 to hit and dam... it isnt a joke, is rather nice. with nightfist and fully clothed and berserk, and arist and frenzy i remember haveing a blade with a 153 damroll.. getting annihilates in regular combat.. a few erradicates here and there, more common with pincer.


all you are saying with this post is that you suck and cant figure out how to make the best of things or cant figure out how to practice something... do yourself a favor, stop makeing yourself look stupid.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]