Imperial Law #2

Imperial Law #2:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by An Old Arbiter on May 26, 2000 at 13:51:58:

In Reply to: Um...(I'll see your $.04 and raise you) posted by Umguy on May 26, 2000 at 13:10:42:

> (The inherent problem is it's tough to say "We're out to rule the world. Oh, except you.") That's why the truce won't last long. I'm simply saying it's not bad roleplay for Minalcar to try.

Noone is arguing that fact, it is probably the most sensable move Minalcar can make.

What is bullshit is that Imperial Law is just being ignored.

That is bad enough, but even worse considering how tightly it has been enforced very, very recently.

What are your thoughts on that?

-An Old Arbiter

Follow Ups:

Um... Umguy 14:09:11 5/26/2000 (3)
- The thief wont brake any rule couse the Empire is not for brave people. Its for inteligent. nt Tecnically 14:25:45 5/26/2000 (2)
  - Which obviously doesn't include you. n/t Haha 14:55:29 5/26/2000 (0)
  - Way to totally miss the point (text) Umguy 14:31:39 5/26/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > (The inherent problem is it's tough to say "We're out to rule the world. Oh, except you.") That's why the truce won't last long. I'm simply saying it's not bad roleplay for Minalcar to try. > > Noone is arguing that fact, it is probably the most sensable move Minalcar can make. > > What is bullshit is that Imperial Law is just being ignored. > > That is bad enough, but even worse considering how tightly it has been enforced very, very recently. > > What are your thoughts on that? > > -An Old Arbiter