I've noticed many more two handed weapons springing up everywhere, so looks like it has to be a true Two hander n/t

I've noticed many more two handed weapons springing up everywhere, so looks like it has to be a true Two hander n/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by *ORB* on June 2, 2000 at 18:16:45:

In Reply to: Missing the boat on paladins. posted by The Great Rumpus Cat on June 2, 2000 at 17:20:19:

> I'm sorry, I seem to be laboring under some sort of misaprehension about paladins. Perhaps one or more of you could clear something up.
>
> I thought if you chose to be a two-handed weapon type, you gave up shields. In return, you used your weapons with a two-handed grasp and learned new techniques to wield them against your foes.
>
> Now, the thing I am confused about is this: There are a relatively few, and fairly far between number of true two-handed weapons. I thought that any weapon the paladin was weilding became such because they were using two hands, rather than a shield. Is this my own error? How does it work?
>
> Thanks for any help on this.
>
> The GRC

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > I'm sorry, I seem to be laboring under some sort of misaprehension about paladins. Perhaps one or more of you could clear something up. > > > > I thought if you chose to be a two-handed weapon type, you gave up shields. In return, you used your weapons with a two-handed grasp and learned new techniques to wield them against your foes. > > > > Now, the thing I am confused about is this: There are a relatively few, and fairly far between number of true two-handed weapons. I thought that any weapon the paladin was weilding became such because they were using two hands, rather than a shield. Is this my own error? How does it work? > > > > Thanks for any help on this. > > > > The GRC