(text) He's not really wrong if you think about it. ( BS ansswer. :-) ):

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Jaedji on June 5, 2000 at 10:10:33:

In Reply to: "Too" not "to" (If it's not your first language I understand) =) posted by The Spelling Plice on June 5, 2000 at 08:35:47:

If you read it as if it is being said in a little whiney teenie bopper girl voice...

"Ragers are to powerful!"
"No they're not!"
"Yes they are!"

> > Ragers are to powerful
> > Masters are to powerful
> > Arbiters are to powerful
> > Empire is to powerful
> > Sylvan is to powerful
> > Rangers are to powerful
> > Warriors are to powerful
> > Transmuters are to powerful
> > Invokers are to powerful
> > Necromancers suck
> > Assassins are to powerful
> > Thieves are to powerful
> > Paladins are to powerful
> > Shamans are to powerful
> > Healers are to powerful
> > Dawn is way to powerful
> > Entropy is underpowered
> > Troupe is practically omnipotent
> > Anti-paladins are to powerful
> > Druids are to powerful
> > Bards are to powerful
> > Conjurers are to powerful
> > Fire giants are to powerful
> > Cloud giants are to powerful
> > Storm giants are to powerful
> > Elves are to powerful
> > Wood-elves are to powerful
> > Dark-elves are to powerful
> > Humans are to powerful
> > Gnomes are to powerful
> > Svirfs are to powerful
> > Duergar are to powerful
> > Dwarves are to powerful
> > Felar are to powerful
> > Arials are to powerful
> > Liches are ok
> > Half-elves are to powerful


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]