That's exactly what I meant, putting in the code for it to be a consented Duel.. Obviously thinking about the consequences before coding something like this.. very discouraging. (n/t)

That's exactly what I meant, putting in the code for it to be a consented Duel.. Obviously thinking about the consequences before coding something like this.. very discouraging. (n/t):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Arm Yourself on July 8, 2000 at 15:09:17:

In Reply to: Actually, I think you missed his point. (text) posted by Pendragon_Surtr on July 8, 2000 at 15:05:51:

> First off, I agree that the cities are a terrible place for a duel and I in no way agree with this idea. I am just showing you what he meant. He meant code it so if both players type in the command duel "each other" instead of them yelling "Help! Player A is attacking me!" when the fight started, you would yell "The duel has begun". This would have to be coded in so that there would be no question for the arbiters on duels. Again, I don't agree with it, just explaining it.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > First off, I agree that the cities are a terrible place for a duel and I in no way agree with this idea. I am just showing you what he meant. He meant code it so if both players type in the command duel "each other" instead of them yelling "Help! Player A is attacking me!" when the fight started, you would yell "The duel has begun". This would have to be coded in so that there would be no question for the arbiters on duels. Again, I don't agree with it, just explaining it.