I wouldn't call that an awesome theory...but thanks Mac the Knife n/t

I wouldn't call that an awesome theory...but thanks Mac the Knife n/t:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by DL on July 12, 2000 at 18:07:29:

In Reply to: I gots news, DL.... the past is only unchangeable by definition given the assumption that you can't travel back in time. Hate to poke holes in your awesome theory like that, but... n/t posted by Macheath on July 12, 2000 at 17:39:53:

> > Knowing full well that the FoN is in the past, and that's it's future is in broad daylight as the Ashes of Nowhere.

> > Is it still worth trying to protect? If you change the past...(kill tulpebb and the burners enough times or something) could the ashes revert back to FoN?

> > But since it is the past is it, by definition, unchangeable.

> > Or does sylvan not really care about it that much and say, "We protect any forest, any time-period"

> > I don't know just some thoughts to toss out there

> > enjoy,
> > DL

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > Knowing full well that the FoN is in the past, and that's it's future is in broad daylight as the Ashes of Nowhere. > > > Is it still worth trying to protect? If you change the past...(kill tulpebb and the burners enough times or something) could the ashes revert back to FoN? > > > But since it is the past is it, by definition, unchangeable. > > > Or does sylvan not really care about it that much and say, "We protect any forest, any time-period" > > > I don't know just some thoughts to toss out there > > > enjoy, > > > DL