Re: Sorry for being harsh, but it is complete sh^t (text inside)

Re: Sorry for being harsh, but it is complete sh^t (text inside):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Magtograme on July 19, 2000 at 15:44:17:

In Reply to: Sorry for being harsh, but it is complete sh^t (text inside) posted by Uli on July 19, 2000 at 14:30:42:

> My point is that caballed chars should be closer to uncaballed
> in their abilities. Cabal powers should be a pleasant
> add-on, but not your main tool.

> Waht do you think about it?

rembering that a rager without the head is weaker than an uncaballed char. This I think is the reason their powers are pretty nice.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > My point is that caballed chars should be closer to uncaballed > > in their abilities. Cabal powers should be a pleasant > > add-on, but not your main tool. > > Waht do you think about it? > rembering that a rager without the head is weaker than an uncaballed char. This I think is the reason their powers are pretty nice.